“Lord of the Rings – The Return of the King”
By Rebecca Redshaw
Comparing a movie to the book it was adapted from is really comparing apples to oranges. If film is to be given the status of an art form, then the making of a movie from another source of inspiration, be it a work of fiction or an historic event, should be treated merely as such – inspiration – not a visual interpretation.
Huh?
I saw the third entry of LORD OF THE RINGS-THE RETURN OF THE KING. I hadn’t read the book nor seen the first two movies, either of which might have made my experience, at the least, understandable. Were these requirements that eluded me in appreciating a film that is being touted as “the best” cinematic achievement in years by some critics?
Before the advent of digital technology, the most obvious hint that a film lacked substance (or a recognizable storyline) was the comment, “The cinematography was beautiful.” Now, thanks to computer generated magic, endless armies, grotesque creatures by the thousands, and towering phallic castles are the stuff which cause film goers to tout to one another after three hours plus of visual bombardment, “The special effects were awesome!”
On this point we agree. THE RETURN OF THE KING is filled with impressive images and I am certain Tolkien aficionados (who proudly separate themselves from cultists we’ve come to know as Trekkies) will take offence to this review. However, while I respect the monumental endeavor director Peter Jackson has tackled, I take exception to this third installment as a good movie. …KING is a great special effects demonstration, but it’s too long and its story too jumbled.
When we aren’t being bombarded with giant birds swooping down on cowering troops or menacing ghouls with bad teeth that drool, we’re treated (?) to endless close-ups of “generations of eyes.” Young Elijah Wood’s eyes are in either a state of tearful awe or fearful terror while on his uphill journey.
No complaints from this desk with Viggo Mortensen. I’ll look into his steely blues any day. His stare says,”I’m the strong, silent type.” You got that right, Vig, but for your next role, note: a little dialogue is a good thing in the talkies.
God bless Ian McKellan. Here’s where the eyes have it. No plastic surgery for this knight in white. He’s the vision of virtue and wisdom and truly the only saving grace in this otherwise drab venture.
So, I’m going on record. I saw LORD OF THE RINGS –THE RETURN OF THE KING and while I can’t honestly say it’s a great film I can unequivocally say, “The special effects were awesome!”